A new study says inclusion of people in U.S. illegally has had little impact on presidential elections or control of Congress ...

In the 1920s, nativist lawmakers introduced “citizen-only” bills. Then, a bipartisan coalition emerged to fight back.

In general, removing undocumented residents from census data used for apportionment would have had a trivial impact on party representation in the House or the outcome of presidential elections ...

TimesMachine is an exclusive benefit for home delivery and digital subscribers. Full text is unavailable for this digitized archive article. Subscribers may view the full text of this article in ...

The question sometimes arises as to whether the malpractice defendants can seek apportionment as to the initial tortfeasor who caused the accident. The answer will depend upon the particular ...

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

If residents lacking permanent legal status had been excluded from the census numbers used in the apportionment process from 1980 to 2020, no more than two seats in the House of Representatives ...

The Founders famously and vigorously debated congressional apportionment policy at the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention of 1787. They eventually agreed that a national decennial census would ...

counted as part of the Golden State’s population. In response, a bipartisan coalition emerged to fight back against these anti-alien apportionment bills. Opponents, including political titans ...