The Supreme Court on Monday was skeptical in that the indictment of a Texas man on charges that he violated a federal law ...

Issue: Whether the Takings Clause’s protection against unconstitutional permit conditions encompass an evidentiary requirement (as opposed to a legislative process) by which the government bears the ...

In Hunter v. United States, to be argued on Tuesday, March 3, the Supreme Court will address how broad federal defendants’ waivers of their right to appeal can be and […] ...

If you are looking for a great introduction to this morning’s argument in United States v. Hemani, please check out this animated explainer, done in partnership with Briefly. Our live […] ...

Issue: Whether a foreign state’s mandatory policy or regulation that foreseeably enables and supports the sexual abuse of children may be susceptible to policy analysis or grounded in policy ...

Issue: Whether a plaintiff may establish specific jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant based on its forum-agnostic “business model,” or whether the plaintiff must allege that the defendant ...

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Monday in United States v. Hemani, the second gun-rights case of the 2025-26 ...

A divided Supreme Court sided with the federal government on Tuesday in U.S. Postal Service v. Konan, a dispute over ...

The argument yesterday in Pung v. Isabella Countyhad two distinct threads. On the one hand, the justices who discussed the ...

Clear Statements is a recurring series by Abbe R. Gluck on civil litigation and the modern regulatory and statutory state.

Controlling Opinions is a recurring series by Richard Re that explores the interaction of law, ideology, and discretion at ...

Yesterday’s decision in The Hain Celestial Group v Palmquist resolves a technical problem about what to do when district ...