And the Supreme Court's own analysis here backs the tech groups' position that social media platforms are engaged in protected expression when they decide what content to allow and how to present it.

The Supreme Court expressed strong concerns on Monday about the sweep of state laws restricting how large social media companies moderate user content.

The U.S. Supreme Court expressed both skepticism and sympathy for new Republican-backed social media laws regulating content moderation at large internet platforms during a marathon session ...

Social media platforms commonly use artificial intelligence for content moderation, with the AI software itself relying on algorithms to screen content posted by social media users.

Social media companies are still required to submit twice-yearly reports notifying state officials of any changes in content moderation policy under what remains of the law.

A coalition led by RCFP is urging the Supreme Court to reject social media content regulation laws in Florida and Texas as unconstitutional.

The best option is to leave content moderation to social media companies and encourage them to do a better job of it. This avoids the 1st Amendment problems of government regulation and the ...

X is now suing to block New York's proposed content moderation law that is similar to California's.

A proposed Missouri rule would give social media users a choice over their algorithm, potentially affecting what they would see and share on social media platforms.

Social Media Social Media Moderation Is Speech, Says Supreme Court The Court is remanding these two cases for more analysis—but it made its views on some key issues clear.