A new study says inclusion of people in U.S. illegally has had little impact on presidential elections or control of Congress ...

The Democratic vote in question wasn't to add representation for non-U.S. citizens, it was to continue following the 14th Amendment.

In general, removing undocumented residents from census data used for apportionment would have had a trivial impact on party representation in the House or the outcome of presidential elections ...

In the 1920s, nativist lawmakers introduced “citizen-only” bills. Then, a bipartisan coalition emerged to fight back.

April 1, is the halfway mark between the 2020 and 2030 decennial census counts. New York State may lose at least two ...

The report notes: “There are no plans to use PES results to produce adjusted population estimates for the purposes of apportionment or redistricting, and there will be no such recommendation.” ...

Census participation levels have long varied among different ... to exclude "individuals who are not citizens of the United States" from the congressional apportionment counts. In that case, ...

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

If residents lacking permanent legal status had been excluded from the census numbers used in the apportionment process from 1980 to 2020, no more than two seats in the House of Representatives ...

The Founders famously and vigorously debated congressional apportionment policy at the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention of 1787. They eventually agreed that a national decennial census would ...